DNA Comparison - Baker Family
                           H
a
p
l
o
3
9
3
3
9
0
1
9
3
9
1
3
8
5
a
3
8
5
b
4
2
6
3
8
8
4
3
9
3
8
9
-
1
3
9
2
3
8
9
-
2
4
5
8
4
5
9
a
4
5
9
b
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
7
4
3
7
4
4
8
4
4
9
4
6
4
a
4
6
4
b
4
6
4
c
4
6
4
d
Descendants of Thomas Baker, c1711-c1777 (Colonial Virginia)
Thomas-David-
William
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9   9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 15 17
Adam Jackson
Baker 1
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 31 15 15 15 17
Thomas-David-
Charles
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 15 17
Thomas-David-
Charles
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 15 17
Thomas-David-
Thomas
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 15 17
Thomas-David-
Thomas
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 15 17
Thomas-David-
James
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 31 15 15 15 17
Thomas-David-
James
R1b1 13 23 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 15 17
Descendants of New England Bakers (Samuel, Alexander)
Samuel
Baker 2
I1a 13 22 14 10 13 15 11 14 11 13 11 30 15 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 29 12 15 15 16
Joshua
Baker 3
R1b1 13 24 14 10 11 13 12 12 12 13 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 16 17
Alexander
Baker 4
R1b1 13 24 14 10 11 13 12 12 12 13 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 16 17
Nathaniel
Baker 5
R1b1 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 16 17

Shaded areas indicate where a particular test differed from the norm of the Thomas Baker group.

1 Adam Jackson Baker is believed to be a descendant of Thomas Baker through his son William.

2 This DNA test was conducted on a well-documented descendant of Samuel Baker of Massachusetts, who married, first, Elinor Winslow. The enormous disparity in the DNA results establishes that Thomas Baker could not have descended from that Samuel Baker.

3 This DNA test was conducted on a well-documented descendant of Joshua Baker of New London CT, who is believed to have been the son of Alexander Baker of Boston. Contemporary records in New London speak of "Joshua, son of Alexander Baker of Boston." Assuming that the Alexander referenced was the Alexander Baker who came to Boston in 1635, the enormous disparity in the DNA results establishes both that Thomas Baker could not have descended from Alexander Baker and that the Samuel Baker who married Elinor Winslow was also not a descendant of Alexander Baker.

4 This DNA test was conducted on a well-documented descendant of Alexander Baker of Boston, who is believed to have been a son or grandson of the original Alexander Baker of Boston.

5 This DNA test was conducted on a well-documented descendant of Nathaniel Baker of CT, who is believed to have been descended from Alexander Baker of Boston.

For complete results of the ongoing Baker DNA testing project, click here. For results of descendants of Thomas Baker, scroll down to the group entitled "Thomas Baker 1711-1777 (?-VA)," in light br /own.

For more information about DNA testing generally, the Frequently Asked Questions section of the Family Tree DNA website offers one of the clearest explanations available.